Thank you, Phoenixx!
Yesterday I noticed that the Visual Basic Scripts are at version number 3.29. As you write 'Installs the needed Visual Basic Scripts (Version 3.27+)' I'm not sure, which version is implemented. The + after the version number let's one think, it's the last version after 3.27. Is it?
What means +NT in your version numbering?
NanoTech?What means +NT in your version numbering?
No, its 3.27 plus a couple not normally included in the standalone package.Yesterday I noticed that the Visual Basic Scripts are at version number 3.29. The + after the version number let's one think, it's the last version after 3.27. Is it?
Besides, i dont know if redistributing a MS System DLL without authorisation is even permitted. Probably not.
I think it'd be okay to include a copy in the installer."An application should use and redistribute msvcr71.dll, and it should avoid placing a copy or using an existing copy of msvcr71.dll in the system directory. Instead, the application should keep a copy of msvcr71.dll in its application directory with the program executable."
Ah,...i just see you edited your second line,...was about to say that if that quote is true (source?) then it should actually not be a legal problem to redistribute the file.
Maybe this will help?
I think it'd be okay to include a copy in the installer.