Maintaining legacy software is a pain. Every software house will eventually stop and start fresh at some point.
I call old stuff, "pet cancer" and it's nothing but trouble.
There's absolutely NO reason to maintain old software. Imagine if we were still using DOS or worse... Windows ME :D
Like one manufacturer once told me regarding a problem in one of their old requirements: "buy more memory or upgrade" (hint: memory would be more expensive).
ok, good point.
some programs get way outdated and time to put it down for the new "more improved".
but in this case C++ has been around for a long time.
i didn't see any reason to put VP9 down.
let's take Toyota for example.
they have some models on the market, in this case i will use (Corolla) for decades with good success.
instead of trashing it and starting over they kept improving it.
it went from rear wheel drive to front wheel drive etc and all the improvements for 50yrs....
Corolla is now one of the best most reliable model in the world because of improvements through the decades.
same with the C++VP9 program.
now we all had to start over and learn a new program.
the VPX program is still C++.
why not apply the new physics to the VP9.
now i have to spend a lot of time learning VPX when i knew and felt comfortable with VP9.
im pulling my hair out a little because i don't know the VPX editor.
when i repeatedly made changes to the flippers trying to get an idea how the VPX editor works i got an error.
the file got corrupted and had to kick it to recycle and get a new copy from the zip folder.
i still didn't hear what version of VP9 the Vortex was updated in.