- Joined
- Jun 23, 2003
- Messages
- 7,201
- Solutions
- 10
- Reaction score
- 3,168
- Points
- 150
- Favorite Pinball Machine
- Jurassic Park
i would like to think that i set the tenor of the thread by my opening statement and the fact of a notable person's death. how you could conceive it otherwise is... something that i don't quite understand and which is offensive to me, frankly.First off, offering a critique of his work is not "slagging the person's memory off". If I had spent the whole thread talking about how he was a horse-fucker, then that would be slagging. I love music and sound, and have since I was a child. So I can honestly tell you that my feelings on Sir George's absolutely horrible stereo mixes are beliefs that are as deeply-held as your professed admiration for him. I might disagree with your beliefs but, as a friend, it didn't enter my mind that I should force you to explain yourself. I'm not sure why you're demanding the same from me.
You have also apparently chosen to ignore the whole entry in which I made a case that Hard Day's Night wouldn't have been the classic album it is without Sir George at the helm. Now, I can't read these threads to you, nic. If you choose to skip parts or read them with a bias already in your mind that I'm saying something positively awful about said dead person, then that is your problem, not mine.
But I'll play your game. I love me some Keith Richards and I'll do my best to be the first to post when he dies later this year. Now let's say you or sleepy or anyone else pops in and says "Yeah, but they weren't too good in the '70s when he was a junkie." Now you tell me what I should do in that situation. Should I indignantly demand that no mention of his drug use be made in the hallowed thread commemorating his passing? Or should I remember my father's words: "Opinions are like assholes: everyone's got one", and talk about how he made Exile On Main St on heroin so it must have been some pretty good horse.
This has been a fun and free-wheeling thread in which opinions were exchanged and a lot of great music was shared. Outside of starting this thread, your participation as been to bitch about how I dared mention "Beatles" and "Stones" in the same sentence and then to complain about all those horrible things I never said about poor ol' Georgie. I'd say I've been pretty good-natured about it up until this latest crap. Now, I grant you, that may be my own "selective thread reading", but that's definitely the vibe I've been getting. On the chance that I'm not wrong, then I'm going to cross my fingers and hope Shakespeare isn't too "hipster" for you. "The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in the stars but in ourselves."
maybe i'm being naive upon internet psychology, but... i truly did attempt a fairly neutral thanks upon the man in this case. i knew very well how you felt about the beatles / martin and did not want to agitate you and others -- frankly there are a lot of younger folks who think the beatles are some variety of overblown joke -- but i, apparently, naively assumed that there would be something of an equal consideration on your part.
consider also that i still don't really know you very well, bill.
it seems (from long ago) we have some common interests and common intelligence, true,
but for my part i've offered a couple times to talk to you in person. you have consistently declined, for your own valid reasons, no doubt.
i really hope that you're going through something right now, bill, because you're not a mean person in general. in fact, you've been brilliant at PN and for the scene as a whole.