You do not have to be an ass about it rascal.
You are all [profanity removed] idiots. Ban me. I don't give a [profanity removed]. I did not say any of that [profanity removed].
I said VP [profanity removed] HAD THIS FUNCTION and I was told NOTHING IS TAKEN AWAY or SKEWED TOWARD CABINETS.
You [profanity removed] don't give a [profanity removed] if it is put back. You just want to [profanity removed] with me.
It's your choice. Visual feedback should have to be discovered, learned, and scripted in. Good God.
I said what Paul quoted. As I tried to explain, and think everyone else is getting, when I say in this post "I did NOT say that" I am not referring to that quote but inside the quote is the words "I did not say that" and it is true. I did not say that. Those words were put into my mouth. Paul I think understands this, but what can he do? He cant post what was said that that was a response to because it is against his nature. That post got me banned. If I was to write the post Rascal did and he responded with that post, I would have been banned as well and he not.
I told you myself, and you respond as if It was a lie, or that I said something else.
Yes there is no collision detection that would allow a returning flipper to interact with the ball. You keep quoting fix though I always preferred to call it a work around. If you think it is not possible to reduce the number of times a ball will interact with a returning flipper, something I could do for upswing or the bottom of the flipper on a downswing as well by the way, by now, then you will never understand. No matter how fast something is headed towards something else. It is never going to catch it if the something else is going faster. That don't mean is is not likely to catch it. It does not mean it will only catch it 1 out of 1,000,000,000 times. It means it will never catch it. If the flipper is moving from the relative safe up position to the relative safe down position faster than the ball is moving, that flipper is going to get to the rested down position which will interact with the ball always, thus the ball will not go through the flipper because it never gets a chance.
But put words into my mouth. You have just proven it was done for no other reason than to either have a angry member at your forum or to have someone to ban. These thing don't matter. You like to tell your membership and this one what I was thinking when I post, and in your mind, once posted it is true.
So you have to keep me banned. Why? Because it doesn't matter that that post was a response to something said about me that I would have been banned for for saying. And the fact that this fact does not matter to you.
Even if you did it would just be a matter of time before you would test me. or another member would test you. You like to mention everything I say, but you always start it there as if I was the only one saying anything. Not once did you quote anything I posted that got me into trouble, which was not a response to something was was said to or about me or my work that would not have got me banned if I had said it to others.
It clear that the facts NEVER trump your opinion, though so I sit here banned for life for what ever it is you think I said.
It's clear that this does not matter, but you do have to be true to your nature.
- Yes I said fuck in a post.
- Yes a conversation with anyone at Paul's site is a conversation with him
-therefore Yes, I did ask Paul to ban me
- Yes I said that out of the blue. when I posted I did not say that, I was not accused of saying anything.
- Avoiding letting the ball anywhere near the flipper would not prevent you from ever seeing it go through the flipper.
- Yes if Paul says I said something I said it.
- Yes if Paul says I meant something then Ok that's now exactly what I meant.
- No a life time ban is nothing drastic enough to avoid.
- Yes I was unhappy with some things that was said, so yes I deserve to be banned. I should have acted like everyone else would not.
- You are a fair man paul
Take care
Chat Bot Mibs:
