You see Vladimir, thats precisely the difference between you and me. (And some other people for that matter.)
When i realize that i screwed up i have the decency to apologize, and, if necessairy, i also have the balls to admit that i have been an idiot. That clears the situation and everyone can move on, which means case closed and i can keep my selfrespect.
But not types like you. You would rather go on for days even weeks twisting and turning my words and their meanings into total utter bullshit that doesnt even make an ounce of sense just to try to save your sorry faces, (as if), totally ignoring the fact that it makes you look more idiotic with every new try. And why it that? Because you are MORONS who will never learn. Thats why.
Point in case; the white inserts remark. Doesnt have
anything to do with the topic at hand whatsoever, not even remotely, yet you feel the need to drag that ancient thing up again only to have something to rave on about at all. Now while some people might actually be stupid enough to believe any of that crap, (which must be your very
modus operandi), there is one significant
flaw in this
strategy to make me look bad, and that is the simple yet
significant fact that everyone can look up that thread to see that i said right from the start that i do not wish to discuss this any further, and that he should simply have his
opinion and i will have mine. That means it doesnt take anything more than just one single look at the thread in question to totally defeat your lame try to
discredit me, yet you are picturing it as if it was me who didnt let go of the topic anyway, which means the only thing you might be accomplishing here
at most could be to make yourself look as
stupid as you obviously are. Now while i do kind of
applaud that, i still have to wonder; what is the
point in doing so anyway?
Masochistic inclinations? Or just sheer stupidity? I mean since it will
gain you
nothing you might as well let it be in the 1st place, not?
I did kind of like the
"if it looks like and walks like and quacks like" sentence though:
Originally posted by stevanflores
This is my first attempt at making a table. Comments and critiques welcome.
Originally posted by ValamirCleaver
Is it the first in a series?
Should we be expecting
Nash Metropolitan,
VW Beetle,
AMC Gremlin,
Ford Pinto,
Chevy Vega, etc...?
I rest my case,...